• Text Size
• Print
• Email

  From:
  

  To:
  

  Hey! Check out this news page: https://www.thebackgroundinvestigator.com/Articles/Yes,-There-is-a--Standard-for-Searching-Single-Name-Subject/3172/index.php.

  SendCancel

International News

Yes, There is a Standard for Searching Single-Name Subject

January 19, 2026 posted by Steve Brownstein

   When conducting a background check or a court record search for a subject with only a single name (a mononym), standard search procedures often fail because the system is built for a "First Name + Last Name" format.     Searching for a subject with only one legal name isn't just a data entry hurdle—it’s a major compliance risk.
   

In the world of background screening and court record retrieval, "split-name" errors (splitting a single name into    First/Last fields) are causing valid records to go undiscovered. This leads to: ❌ Inaccurate Consumer Reports ❌ High FCRA litigation risks ❌ Failed identity verification for international candidates

I’ve published a new Operational Guide on Issuu that outlines the "Rule of Thumb" for CRAs, HR departments, and Court Researchers to ensure 100% data integrity for single-name (mononym) subjects.

Key Takeaways from the Guide:

  The Primary Identifier Rule: Why the "Surname" field is the only safe anchor for a mononym.

   Placeholder Prohibition: Why entering "FNU," N/A,"or "XXX" is a "dirty data" trap.

   ICAO Alignment: How to match court dockets to the Machine Readable Zone (MRZ) of a passport.
   The Double-Identifier Mandate: Moving beyond name-only matching to meet 2026 CFPB standards.

Whether you are at a terminal in a Court or processing a global background check at a CRA, these standards are your safeguard against misidentification.

Read the full Operational Guide here:  https://lnkd.in/gFYWzkEh