Ensuring Security and Integrity in a Complex World What is Sanctions Screening? Sanctions Lists Defined: Sanctions lists contain names of individuals, entities, and cou...
AI for Identity Verification How It’s Used: -Biometric Matching: AI compares selfies or video with government-issued ID photos (e.g., driver’s li...
Two persons from a private company have been arrested for allegedly forging ‘police clearance certificates' for contractual employees to gain access to high-security zone...
Hundreds of thousands of people charged with crimes are paying their way out of criminal records in deals brokered by prosecutors in court hallways, according to a report/ . Out-of-co...
New Product. A Global Criminal Record Database Search Who hasn't been pitched to use (for a fee) a Global Database Search for International Criminal Records." ...
A class action lawsuit was filed Thursday against Walmart for firing Black workers with criminal records. Former workers, attorneys and advocates gathered in Federal Plaza...
Court Record Searches - Do this first before you begin: When a court record provider manually searches for criminal records via a public access computer or an online docket sea...
Utahns might want to look up online court records to track a case they’re involved in, background a date or check into a neighbor’s history before letting their kids play next...
According to an EY study titled ‘The First Firewall: Background checks as India Inc.’s frontline defense’, employment frauds have surged significantly over the last year...
ColoradoCriminalRecords.us: A New Website for Accessing Colorado Criminal Records...
County House Research offers the be...
From:
To:
Hey! Check out this news page: https://www.thebackgroundinvestigator.com/Articles/Swift-being-sued-for-not-disclosing-it-used-background-checks-in-hiring/1298/index.php.
SendCancel
August 12, 2013 posted by Steve Brownstein
Swift Transportation has been sued in a federal court for allegedly violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act by not disclosing to applicants that it could access background checks and not allowing applicants to contest those background checks.
The class-action suit, brought by lead plaintiff James Ellis III, says the company neglected to disclose the information to more than 10,000 applicants. Ellis claims in the lawsuit he was denied a job with Swift after the company did a background check. He argues the company was not authorized to view the report, which was pulled from HireRight Solutions, nor did they disclose to him that he could view a free copy of the report within 60 days and that he could dispute the accuracy of any information within the report.
The lawsuit says that per the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Swift should have notified Ellis within three business days of disqualifying him from employment that the action had been taken because of the information in the report and that he could receive a free report. Swift also per FCRA law would have been required to disclose HireRight’s contact information. The lawsuit says that since 2006 Swift has purchased consumer reports and criminal background checks and does not “provide or obtain an appropriate disclosure and authorization from job applicants…prior to acquiring these criminal background reports.
FCRA laws allows consumers to recover punitive and statutory damages, attorney’s fees and costs for “willful violations of its provisions,” the lawsuit says.
rightside one
2025 The Background Investigator. All Rights Reserved.