Ensuring Security and Integrity in a Complex World What is Sanctions Screening? Sanctions Lists Defined: Sanctions lists contain names of individuals, entities, and cou...
AI for Identity Verification How It’s Used: -Biometric Matching: AI compares selfies or video with government-issued ID photos (e.g., driver’s li...
Two persons from a private company have been arrested for allegedly forging ‘police clearance certificates' for contractual employees to gain access to high-security zone...
Hundreds of thousands of people charged with crimes are paying their way out of criminal records in deals brokered by prosecutors in court hallways, according to a report/ . Out-of-co...
New Product. A Global Criminal Record Database Search Who hasn't been pitched to use (for a fee) a Global Database Search for International Criminal Records." ...
A class action lawsuit was filed Thursday against Walmart for firing Black workers with criminal records. Former workers, attorneys and advocates gathered in Federal Plaza...
Court Record Searches - Do this first before you begin: When a court record provider manually searches for criminal records via a public access computer or an online docket sea...
Utahns might want to look up online court records to track a case they’re involved in, background a date or check into a neighbor’s history before letting their kids play next...
According to an EY study titled ‘The First Firewall: Background checks as India Inc.’s frontline defense’, employment frauds have surged significantly over the last year...
ColoradoCriminalRecords.us: A New Website for Accessing Colorado Criminal Records...
County House Research offers the be...
From:
To:
Hey! Check out this news page: https://www.thebackgroundinvestigator.com/Articles/Staff-Vetting-Leaves-70m-Bill-/219/index.php.
SendCancel
December 01, 2010 posted by Steve Brownstein
Staff vetting in the health and social care sectors ran up costs of almost £70 million last year, figures have shown.
Campaigners claimed the rules requiring Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks for carers working with vulnerable adults were a waste of money.
They said it costs millions of pounds, adding that the money would be better spent elsewhere on delivering improved public services.
The call comes after a Government review was recently launched into the vetting of people working with vulnerable adults. The review will also look at the criminal records regime.
Home Secretary Theresa May pushed for a "common sense" approach to brought in, with the Government saying current procedures were "not a proportionate response".
Ken McLaughlin, co-author of the report Carers or Suspects?, said: "Official policy vastly overstates the vulnerability of adults receiving health or social care. This is just a licence for the state to interfere in caring relationships."
Co-author Josie Appleton, director of the Manifesto Club which campaigns against the hyper-regulation of everyday life, added: "As well as wasting public money, over-cautious rules mean that carers cannot do their jobs in the way they want to - for example, they can't be alone with an elderly person in a car, or can't help an old lady to the toilet."
The total cost for CRB checks for those working with vulnerable adults has reached £164.7 million since 2004, including £69 million in 2009/10 alone, the report found.
rightside one
2025 The Background Investigator. All Rights Reserved.