Ensuring Security and Integrity in a Complex World What is Sanctions Screening? Sanctions Lists Defined: Sanctions lists contain names of individuals, entities, and cou...
AI for Identity Verification How It’s Used: -Biometric Matching: AI compares selfies or video with government-issued ID photos (e.g., driver’s li...
Two persons from a private company have been arrested for allegedly forging ‘police clearance certificates' for contractual employees to gain access to high-security zone...
Hundreds of thousands of people charged with crimes are paying their way out of criminal records in deals brokered by prosecutors in court hallways, according to a report/ . Out-of-co...
New Product. A Global Criminal Record Database Search Who hasn't been pitched to use (for a fee) a Global Database Search for International Criminal Records." ...
A class action lawsuit was filed Thursday against Walmart for firing Black workers with criminal records. Former workers, attorneys and advocates gathered in Federal Plaza...
Court Record Searches - Do this first before you begin: When a court record provider manually searches for criminal records via a public access computer or an online docket sea...
Utahns might want to look up online court records to track a case they’re involved in, background a date or check into a neighbor’s history before letting their kids play next...
According to an EY study titled ‘The First Firewall: Background checks as India Inc.’s frontline defense’, employment frauds have surged significantly over the last year...
ColoradoCriminalRecords.us: A New Website for Accessing Colorado Criminal Records...
County House Research offers the be...
From:
To:
Hey! Check out this news page: https://www.thebackgroundinvestigator.com/Articles/Criminal-record-is-a-relevant-concern-in-Illinois/1464/index.php.
SendCancel
October 28, 2013 posted by Steve Brownstein
There's nothing wrong with giving people a second chance, but Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn is going about it the wrong way.
Quinn signed an executive order that will make it easier for individuals convicted of crimes to get a state job. His order eliminates the portion of a state employment application that requires applicants to provide information on their criminal history.
Putting his decision in the best possible light, Quinn said that "a law-abiding citizen's past mistakes should not serve as a lifetime barrier to employment."
The type of person Quinn describes deserves a fair evaluation. But equating a criminal conviction with "past mistakes" is a clever way to minimize unlawful conduct that runs the gamut from criminal mischief to theft, armed robbery and murder.
Besides, this issue is not just about the employee. It's also about the employer and his need to hire a trustworthy person to carry out what could be very important duties.
This issue has been percolating through the political process for several years, largely on the strength of the argument that requiring information about criminal history is racially discriminatory.
Proponents argue that minorities suffer disproportionately under the mandatory disclosure rule because they are arrested and imprisoned in greater numbers than whites. That claim is supported by the numbers, but people who get in trouble with the law aren't selected at random. They make trouble for themselves, one consequence being that their brushes with the law make them less attractive as employees.
Quinn's action does not constitute an outright ban on information regarding criminal history. It merely eliminates the issue during the prospective employee's initial application phase. Supporters of the ban contend that applicants often are rejected early in the application process simply because of their criminal background.
Under Quinn's new hiring arrangement, state agencies will be able to conduct background checks and seek conviction information later in the hiring process.
rightside one
2025 The Background Investigator. All Rights Reserved.