Ensuring Security and Integrity in a Complex World What is Sanctions Screening? Sanctions Lists Defined: Sanctions lists contain names of individuals, entities, and cou...
AI for Identity Verification How It’s Used: -Biometric Matching: AI compares selfies or video with government-issued ID photos (e.g., driver’s li...
Two persons from a private company have been arrested for allegedly forging ‘police clearance certificates' for contractual employees to gain access to high-security zone...
Hundreds of thousands of people charged with crimes are paying their way out of criminal records in deals brokered by prosecutors in court hallways, according to a report/ . Out-of-co...
New Product. A Global Criminal Record Database Search Who hasn't been pitched to use (for a fee) a Global Database Search for International Criminal Records." ...
CRA's "The New Age" - Before anything else, confirm identity. Digital identity verification has become an increasingly integral component of modern background screening....
A class action lawsuit was filed Thursday against Walmart for firing Black workers with criminal records. Former workers, attorneys and advocates gathered in Federal Plaza...
Court Record Searches - Do this first before you begin: When a court record provider manually searches for criminal records via a public access computer or an online docket sea...
According to an EY study titled ‘The First Firewall: Background checks as India Inc.’s frontline defense’, employment frauds have surged significantly over the last year...
ColoradoCriminalRecords.us: A New Website for Accessing Colorado Criminal Records...
County House Research offers the be...
From:
To:
Hey! Check out this news page: https://www.thebackgroundinvestigator.com/Articles/California-Courts-and-Record-Access/1268/index.php.
SendCancel
July 02, 2013 posted by Steve Brownstein
Trailer Bill Killed But New Bill Passed That Alters Public Records Act
There was quite a bit of news and push back about the trailer bill that would have dramatically altered the fee structure for viewing and obtaining court records in California. The bill was killed by the legislature on June 14, 2013.
However, another bill was added to the budget bill which was passed on the 14th. SB71 (or AB76) modifies wording in the California Public Records Act (CPRA)T.
Currently, the CPRA states "...requires state and local agencies to make public records available upon receipt of a request that reasonably describes an identifiable record not otherwise exempt from disclosure, upon the payment of fees to cover costs." SB71 modifies CPRA so that state and local government are merely "encouraged" to make the public records available as per CPRA. SB71 also makes compliance with certain provisions of CPRA as "optional" rather than required - menaing agencies can opt out. The provisions deal with access public records, including court records.
According to published reports this is a budget issue and the Department of Finance expects agencies who opt out will save the state tens of millions of dollars. Another in-depth article is available from the Courthouse News Service at www.courthousenews.com/2013/06/18/58616.htm.
View SB71 or AB76 at www.leginfo.ca.gov/index.html. The bill specifically alters Sections 6252 by adding 6252.8 which in turn makes certain parts of the CPRA optional including provisions in 6253.
View the section affected in the CPRA at:
www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=06001-07000&file=6250-6270
rightside one
2025 The Background Investigator. All Rights Reserved.